Free mobule sex chat - Why radioactive dating is wrong

Anyone who’s read the first three posts in this series is aware that I’ve not only been buried in the things Musk is doing, I’ve been drinking a tall glass of the Elon Musk Kool-Aid throughout. After emerging from the 1990s dotcom party with 0 million, instead of sitting back in his investor chair listening to pitches from groveling young entrepreneurs, he decided to start a brawl with a .And all of this, it really seems, for the purpose of giving our species a better future. But someone being exceptionally rad isn’t Kool-Aid worthy enough to warrant 90,000 words over a string of months on a blog that’s supposed to be about a wide range of topics.

why radioactive dating is wrong-84

Free sex chatting site without account or subscription - Why radioactive dating is wrong

To them, any conclusions from the science community were moot because they were breaking the rules of the game to begin with.

The Earth was less than 6,000 years old, so if radiometric dating showed otherwise, it was a flawed technique, period.

Once things settled down, the Earth was no longer a perfect sphere—all the commotion had distorted the surface, bringing about mountains and valleys and caves down below, and the whole thing was littered with the fossils of the flood’s victims. For theologians of the time, it was their version of the general relativity vs.

quantum mechanics quandary, and Burnet had come up with a viable string theory to unify it all under one roof. There were enough theories kicking around reconciling geology with the verses of the Bible to today warrant a 15,000-word “Flood Geology” Wikipedia page.

I’m fascinated by those rare people in history who manage to dramatically change the world during their short time here, and I’ve always liked to study those people and read their biographies.

Those people know something the rest of us don’t, and we can learn something valuable from them.But the scientists started the game with no rules at all.The puzzle was a blank slate where any observations and measurements they found were welcome.Just recently, an author named Tom Vail wrote a book called Contrary to what is widely believed, radioactive dating has not proven the rocks of the Grand Canyon to be millions of years old.The vast majority of the sedimentary layers in the Grand Canyon were deposited as the result of a global flood that occurred after and as a result of the initial sin that took place in the Garden of Eden.In 1907, there was a huge breakthrough when American scientist Bertram Boltwood pioneered the technique of deciphering the age of rocks through radiometric dating, which found elements in a rock with a known rate of radioactive decay and measured what portion of those elements remained intact and what portion had already converted to decay substance.

Tags: , ,