Radiometric dating proved wrong

Thus radioactive dating relies purely on assumptions.

We could put forward the following counter arguments to the constancy of these assumptions: a) The constancy of cosmic ray bombardment might be questioned.

The topic of radiometric dating has received some of the most vicious attacks by young earth creation science theorists.

Did you know that you can be a Christian, and believe that the earth is billions of years old?

You can even believe in evolution and be a Christian.

No scientist can guarantee that any sample can be considered a closed system unless it was isolated from its environment when it was formed.

Elements can be transported into a sample or leach out of a sample.

Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.

You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.Radiometric dating remains a reliable scientific method.For articles on the RATE project, see the Rate Index.d) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without knowledge of the exact ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14in the initial sample, the dating technique is subject to question.It's assumed that the clock was set to zero when the study material was formed.If dated with the carbon-14 method, the flow appears to be less than 17,000 years old, but dating with the potassium argon method gives dates of 160,000 to 43 million years.

Tags: , ,