Radiometric dating proved wrong online dating valentines day ideas

If even a small percentage of the limestone deposits were still in the form of living marine organisms at the time of the Flood, then the small amount of carbon-14 would have mixed with a much larger carbon-12 reservoir, thus resulting in a drastically reduced ratio.

radiometric dating proved wrong-34

Volcanic ejecta of Mount Rangitoto (Auckland, New Zealand) was found to have a potassium-40 age of 485,000 years, yet trees buried within the volcanic material were dated with the carbon-14 method to be less than 300 years old.

A further example from a lava flow off the coast of Hawaii shows similar discrepancies.

The current high rate of entry might be a consequence of a disturbed post-Flood environment that altered the .

Some scientists argue that the magnetic field of the earth has declined over time.

However, conditions may have been different in the past and could have influenced the rate of decay or formation of radioactive elements.

Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.

Radiometric dating remains a reliable scientific method.

For articles on the RATE project, see the Rate Index.

Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.

Tags: , ,